Operations / Grade submission workflow
Grade submission workflow
From collected evaluations to posted grades: director review, comparability check, SIS entry, student notification, and the timeliness report that keeps Element 9.8 out of the findings column.
Collect completed evaluations
Grading starts from a complete file — not from whoever submitted first.
Director review and comparability check
Element 8.7: grades must be comparable across sites. The director's review is where that is proven.
Propose and post grades
The SIS entry is the official record — it needs an audit trail.
Notify students and open the appeal window
Students need to know their grade, and the appeal path, at the same time.
Report timeliness quarterly
Element 9.8 (fair and timely summative assessment): report the distribution, not just the average.
Your checklist progress is saved on this device only — it is never sent anywhere or shared.
Grounded in: Functions and Structure of a Medical School (March 2026) — Elements 1.4, 6.2, 8.7, 9.1, 9.5, 9.7, 9.8 (lcme.org); AAMC VSLO (aamc.org); ACGME Common Program Requirements (acgme.org). School-specific rules come from your own documents.